Range Between Outer-Right and -Left Parties
Quick Info
Polarization: ideological elite
Data: marpor ches
Use Cases: @abedi_challenges_2002 @crepaz_impact_1990 @matakos_electoral_2016 @andrews_spatial_2009 @wessels_meaningful_2008 @banda_elite_2018 @mair_reflections_1997
Polarization: ideological elite
Data: marpor ches
Use Cases: @abedi_challenges_2002 @crepaz_impact_1990 @matakos_electoral_2016 @andrews_spatial_2009 @wessels_meaningful_2008 @banda_elite_2018 @mair_reflections_1997
Description
The range between the two most distant parties on the left-right dimension in a party system is one of the earliest, first used by Crepaz (1990), and most widely used measures of ideological polarization. While the measure has mostly been applied to CHES expert ratings and MARPOR estimates of party positions, it is in principle applicable to any estimates of party positions, regardless of their source.
Operationalization
The range is defined as follows: $$range = max(lr_p)-min(lr_p)$$
where $lr_p$ is the left-right position of a party $p$ and the measure captures the difference between the left-most and right-most party, i.e., the range.
polaR
We have written custom R functions for coding this measure and assembled it, along with other functions, into an R package that is currently under development.
The package can be installed from GitLab.
Comments, suggestions, and feature requests are welcome.
# Import Data
cses_imd <- polaR_import(source = "cses_imd",
path = "path/to/dataset.dta")
# A range can be computed on the individual level or between already aggregated scores, this can be specified using 'level'
# The data output can be provided with individual scores or aggregated to a country/year level with 'aggregate'
# Where different issue dimensions are available, 'issue' can be issued to specify the one to use
range_data <- range(cses_imd,
issue = "leftright",
level = c("individual", "aggregate"),
aggregate = c(TRUE, FALSE))
Visualization
Use cases
Publications that use this measure:
Title | Authors |
---|---|
Challenges to established parties | Abedi (2002) |
The Spatial Structure of Party Competition | Andrews and Money (2009) |
Elite polarization, party extremity, and affective polarization | Banda and Cluverius (2018) |
The impact of party polarisation and postmaterialism on voter turnout | Crepaz (1990) |
Reflections | Mair and Castles (1997) |
Electoral Rule Disproportionality and Platform Polarisation | Matakos et al. (2016) |
Meaningful choices, political supply, and institutional effectiveness | Wessels and Schmitt (2008) |