(Weighted) mean distance from the most-liked party

Description

The (weighted) mean distance from the most liked party is a measure suggested by Wagner (2021), although he considers it inferior to the (weighted) spread. It measures the average discrepancy between like for the most liked party and like/dislike for all other parties. Wagner computes the (weighted) distance based on the CSES dataset, but in principle it can be applied to other datasets that contain the required items, i.e., like-dislike scores. ​

Operationalization

Wagner proceeds in two steps. First, they calculate the (weighted) mean distance for each respondent. Second, they aggregate to the party-system level by taking the mean of the respondents’ distance scores. The unweighted and weighted distance measures are calculated as follows:

Unweighted: $Distance_i = \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{p=1}^p (like_{ip} - like_{max,i})^2}{n_p}}$

Weighted: $Distance_i = \sqrt{\sum_{p=1}^p v_p (like_{ip} - like_{max,i})^2}$

The subscript $i$ denotes an individual respondent, $p$ denotes a party, $max$ is the most liked party, and $v_p$ is the percentage of votes received by a party. ​

polaR

We have written custom R functions for coding this measure and assembled it, along with other functions, into an R package that is currently under development. The package can be installed from GitLab. Comments, suggestions, and feature requests are welcome.
# Import Data
cses_imd <- polaR_import(source = "cses_imd",
						 path = "path/to/dataset.dta")

# Use 'weighted' to toggle between the weighted and unweighted measure
# The data output can be provided with individual scores or aggregated to a country/year level with 'aggregate'
cses_imd <- distance(cses_imd,
					 weighted = c(TRUE, FALSE),
					 aggregate = c(TRUE, FALSE))

​

Visualization

Use cases

Publications that use this measure:

TitleAuthors
The Downsian roots of affective polarization
  • Algara and Zur (2023)
Elite communication and affective polarization among voters
  • Bäck et al. (2023)
Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization
  • Boxell et al. (2022)
What can De-Polarize the Polarizers?
  • Ciobanu and Sandu (2022)
Ideological identity, issue-based ideology and bipolar affective polarization in multiparty systems
  • Comellas and Torcal (2023)
The Two-Way Effects of Populism on Affective Polarization
  • Davis et al. (2024)
Affective polarization and strategic voting in Britain
  • Down and Han (2024)
What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?
  • Druckman and Levendusky (2019)
Affective Polarization towards Parties and Leaders, and Electoral Participation in 13 Parliamentary Democracies, 1980–2019
  • Ferreira da Silva and Garzia (2025)
Validating the feeling thermometer as a measure of partisan affect in multi-party systems
  • Gidron et al. (2022)
Gender and affective polarization
  • Han (2025)
Affective polarization and the salience of elections
  • Hernández et al. (2021)
Affect, Not Ideology
  • Iyengar et al. (2012)
Populist attitudes, cleavage identification, and polarization in Austria and Germany
  • Jungkunz and Helbling (2025)
Why can&rsquo;t we be friends?
  • Norman and Green (2025)
Affective polarization and habits of political participation
  • Phillips (2024)
Overlapping polarization
  • Riera and Madariaga (2023)
Exploring differences in affective polarization between the Nordic countries
  • Ryan (2023)
Economic Integration, Party Polarisation and Electoral Turnout
  • Steiner and Martin (2012)
Intergroup contact reduces affective polarization but not among strong party identifiers
  • Thomsen and Thomsen (2023)
What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization across Countries?
  • Tichelbaecker et al. (2023)
Social trust and affective polarization in Spain (2014–19)
  • Torcal and Thomson (2023)
Affective polarisation in multiparty systems
  • Wagner (2021)
Elite Cooperation and Affective Polarization
  • Wagner and Harteveld (2024)
Affective polarization and coalition signals
  • Wagner and Praprotnik (2023)
TitleAuthors
Elite communication and affective polarization among voters
  • Bäck et al. (2023)
Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization
  • Boxell et al. (2022)
What can De-Polarize the Polarizers?
  • Ciobanu and Sandu (2022)
Ideological identity, issue-based ideology and bipolar affective polarization in multiparty systems
  • Comellas and Torcal (2023)
The Two-Way Effects of Populism on Affective Polarization
  • Davis et al. (2024)
Affective polarization and strategic voting in Britain
  • Down and Han (2024)
What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?
  • Druckman and Levendusky (2019)
Affective Polarization towards Parties and Leaders, and Electoral Participation in 13 Parliamentary Democracies, 1980–2019
  • Ferreira da Silva and Garzia (2025)
Validating the feeling thermometer as a measure of partisan affect in multi-party systems
  • Gidron et al. (2022)
Gender and affective polarization
  • Han (2025)
Affective polarization and the salience of elections
  • Hernández et al. (2021)
Affect, Not Ideology
  • Iyengar et al. (2012)
Populist attitudes, cleavage identification, and polarization in Austria and Germany
  • Jungkunz and Helbling (2025)
Why can&rsquo;t we be friends? Untangling conjoined polarization in America
  • Norman and Green (2025)
Affective polarization and habits of political participation
  • Phillips (2024)
Overlapping polarization
  • Riera and Madariaga (2023)
Exploring differences in affective polarization between the Nordic countries
  • Ryan (2023)
Economic Integration, Party Polarisation and Electoral Turnout
  • Steiner and Martin (2012)
Intergroup contact reduces affective polarization but not among strong party identifiers
  • Thomsen and Thomsen (2023)
What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization across Countries?
  • Tichelbaecker et al. (2023)
Social trust and affective polarization in Spain (2014–19)
  • Torcal and Thomson (2023)
Affective polarisation in multiparty systems
  • Wagner (2021)
Elite Cooperation and Affective Polarization: Evidence From German Coalitions
  • Wagner and Harteveld (2024)
Affective polarization and coalition signals
  • Wagner and Praprotnik (2023)